Best Machine Learning Development Agencies

LatentView Analytics vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: July 2026

Quick verdict

Addepto (4.1/5) edges ahead of LatentView Analytics (3.9/5) overall. Addepto is the better choice for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition.. LatentView Analytics is the stronger option for companies wanting analytics and BI delivery with ML capability layered in, rather than a pure-play ML specialist.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

LatentView Analytics vs Addepto: head-to-head summary

Criterion LatentView Analytics Addepto
Founded 2006 2018
HQ Chennai, India Warsaw, Poland
Team size 1,001–5,000 51–200
Rating 3.9 / 5 4.1 / 5
Best for Companies wanting analytics and BI delivery with ML capability layered in, rather than a pure-play ML specialist. Companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition.
Pricing model Fixed project and managed analytics services Fixed project and consulting retainer
Min. engagement Not published $20K
Primary tech stack Python, Tableau, AWS Python, Scikit-learn, TensorFlow
Industries served Retail, Financial Services, Technology/SaaS, CPG Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing

LatentView Analytics vs Addepto: overview

LatentView Analytics

LatentView Analytics is a business analytics and digital transformation consultancy founded in 2006 by Venkat Viswanathan and Pramod Jandhyala, headquartered in Chennai, India. The company completed an IPO on the NSE and BSE in December 2021, reporting record oversubscription, and now employs roughly 1,170 people. Its work spans broader business analytics and BI in addition to custom ML model development.

Addepto

Addepto is an AI and data consulting company founded in Warsaw, Poland in 2018 by Edwin Lisowski and Artur Haponik (one source lists 2017), specializing in machine learning, artificial intelligence, and business intelligence solutions. Reported headcount is roughly 55–58 employees across Europe, North America, and Asia. In December 2025, Addepto was acquired by KMS Technology; prospective clients should confirm how the acquisition affects team continuity, existing contracts, and service delivery going forward.

Services and capabilities: LatentView Analytics vs Addepto

Capability LatentView Analytics Addepto
Custom ML model development
Deep learning & computer vision
NLP & LLM / Generative AI
MLOps & production deployment
Data engineering
AI strategy consulting
Staff augmentation

Tech stack comparison: LatentView Analytics vs Addepto

Framework / platform LatentView Analytics Addepto
Python
TensorFlow N/A
PyTorch N/A N/A
AWS
Azure N/A
Google Cloud N/A N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A
Databricks N/A N/A
LangChain N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: LatentView Analytics vs Addepto

Criterion LatentView Analytics Addepto
Minimum engagement Not published $20K
Engagement models Fixed project, Managed services Fixed project, Consulting retainer
Rate transparency Not public Minimum disclosed
Price tier Enterprise / not published Accessible

Target audience comparison: LatentView Analytics vs Addepto

Dimension LatentView Analytics Addepto
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Retail, Financial Services, Technology/SaaS Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing
Best use cases Companies wanting a combined BI dashboard and predictive-model deliverable, Retail or CPG analytics programs where ML is one part of a broader reporting stack Mid-market companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting now paired with KMS Technology's broader resources, Business intelligence projects that also require a machine learning component
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

LatentView Analytics vs Addepto: pros and cons

LatentView Analytics
+ Public listing since December 2021 provides financial transparency uncommon among private competitors
+ 19 years of continuous operation with founders still central to the business
+ 1,170+ employees supports mid-to-large scale engagements
+ Broad BI and analytics capability useful for buyers who need reporting alongside ML
- Core positioning is business analytics/BI first, with custom ML development as one offering rather than the central focus
- Less specialist ML certification or AI-first branding than firms like Quantiphi or Neurons Lab
- Minimum engagement size not publicly disclosed
Addepto
+ 7 years of focused AI/BI consulting experience prior to the KMS Technology acquisition
+ Small team size historically meant direct founder-level access on engagements
+ Multi-continent presence (Europe, North America, Asia) despite a compact headcount
+ Acquisition by KMS Technology (Dec 2025) may bring additional delivery resources and stability
- Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025 — buyers should confirm how this affects team continuity, pricing, and existing contracts before signing
- Public sources disagree on exact founding year (2017 vs. 2018) and employee count (55 vs. 58)
- Post-acquisition integration could change the service delivery model in ways not yet publicly documented

Who should choose LatentView Analytics?

LatentView Analytics is the right choice for companies wanting analytics and BI delivery with ML capability layered in, rather than a pure-play ML specialist..

Publicly listed (NSE/BSE since 2021) analytics firm with two decades of operating history.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial Services, Technology/SaaS, CPG.

Who should choose Addepto?

Addepto is the right choice for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition..

Boutique AI/BI consultancy that gained additional scale and resources through its December 2025 acquisition by KMS Technology.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Retail, Manufacturing.

Decision matrix: LatentView Analytics vs Addepto

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope LatentView Analytics
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: LatentView Analytics (Not published) vs Addepto ($20K)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical LatentView Analytics
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Addepto

Use case fit: LatentView Analytics vs Addepto

Use case LatentView Analytics fit Addepto fit Winner
Companies wanting a combined BI dashboard and predictive-model deliverable Strong Strong Both equally
Retail or CPG analytics programs where ML is one part of a broader reporting stack Strong Limited LatentView Analytics
Mid-market companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting now paired with KMS Technology's broader resources Limited Strong Addepto
Business intelligence projects that also require a machine learning component Limited Strong Addepto
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: LatentView Analytics vs Addepto

Addepto (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Boutique AI/BI consultancy that gained additional scale and resources through its December 2025 acquisition by KMS Technology.. It is best for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition..

LatentView Analytics (3.9/5) is the better choice when companies wanting analytics and BI delivery with ML capability layered in, rather than a pure-play ML specialist.. If your situation matches those criteria, LatentView Analytics is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

LatentView Analytics vs Addepto FAQ

Is LatentView Analytics better than Addepto?

Addepto (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. LatentView Analytics is better for companies wanting analytics and BI delivery with ML capability layered in, rather than a pure-play ML specialist.. Addepto is better for companies wanting boutique AI/BI consulting from a team now backed by KMS Technology's additional resources post-acquisition..

How do LatentView Analytics and Addepto differ in pricing?

LatentView Analytics uses fixed project and managed analytics services pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Addepto uses fixed project and consulting retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: LatentView Analytics or Addepto?

LatentView Analytics is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between LatentView Analytics and Addepto?

LatentView Analytics's primary differentiator is: publicly listed (nse/bse since 2021) analytics firm with two decades of operating history.. Addepto's primary differentiator is: boutique ai/bi consultancy that gained additional scale and resources through its december 2025 acquisition by kms technology.. They also differ in team size (1,001–5,000 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K), and primary industries served (Retail, Financial Services vs Financial Services, Retail).

Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.